Success Stories

The Arab World's Most Prominent Architect: ZAHA HADID

Internationally renowned architect Zaha Hadid, founder of Zaha Hadid Architects, is the recipient of many awards, including the prestigious Pritzker Architecture Prize.

Her unique projects span 44 countries across the world. The following interview with Zaha Hadid took place at the Royal Academy in London’s Piccadilly.

test-7.jpg

The Heydar Aliyev Center in Baku, completed in 2012, designed to be the primary building for Azerbaijan’s cultural programs (Photo: Hufton+Crow)

 

test-low.jpg

The interior of the Beijing New Airport Terminal building (Photo: Zaha Hadid Architects)

 

Zaha, you have said that architecture is not for people who want an easy life. Is this not the case for anyone who wants to excel in his or her job?

There are other professions that are very difficult, but architecture is particularly difficult because your career is reliant on the people you work with, and that’s the first hurdle. The second hurdle is the people you work with as a client. You have no control over the developer or the economics.

 

Like when you worked in Cardiff?

Today is twenty years to the day for the Cardiff Opera House project, and people forget what happened. It was a very nasty experience, but it made us much stronger. It’s a shame they didn’t build the Cardiff Opera House, but I can’t have everything.

 

Do you think you had it particularly tough because your projects are too ambitious? 

My work is not within the accepted box, maybe because I am a woman and an Arab. There was a certain prejudice about these things.

 

You became a teacher in important universities all over the world. The Architectural Association, Harvard, now you teach in Vienna? 

I always thought teaching was very important. You learn from what you teach, and show people they can achieve beyond what they thought possible for them to do.

 

What do you teach? 

I don’t think you can teach architecture; you can only inspire people. In Vienna it is called a masterclass because you are a master and the students are with you for 5 or 6 years. At the end the students have learned your repertoire and your expertise.

 

Do they then come to work for you?

Some of the best people in my studio are from the Vienna program, and also the Architectural Association. I am investing in my studio (laughs).

 

You studied mathematics in Lebanon. Can you say an architect is a mixture of many talents? Drawing, engineering, diplomacy? 

Diplomacy! Not my best talent! I don’t play up to people. I remember Rem Koolhaus when they asked me to join the Office for Metropolitan Architecture (OMA) and I said, “Only as a partner.” I mean, honestly! I had just finished school. And they said, “As long as you are an obedient partner.” I said, “No, I am not going to be an obedient partner.” That was the end of my partnership!

 

For a long time you were a theoretician architect. Then something changed and you became a very productive architect, working all over the world? 

I always wanted to build what I call the theoretical project. Work on paper was never intended just to be drawing, but to have a productive reality. At the Architectural Association in the early mid-70s, when post-‘68 all faith in architecture had collapsed, they were still dominated by the dogma of modernism. Alternatives were historicism, post-modernism and neo-rationalism. I thought there must be another alternative, and so I started to complete the modernist project, not knowing that in this endeavor I would discover other things.

test-3.jpg

A rendering of Al Wakrah Stadium in Qatar (Photo: Zaha Hadid Architects)

At the end of the day your shapes are artistic shapes.

Architecture is semi-artistic, but you are inspired by nature, landscape, biology, and all living things. You can be far more ambitious now, you can make great spatial experiences, but the one thing that hasn’t changed is that we have to deal with gravity, to land on the ground. I learned from a great engineer called Peter Rice to understand the logic of structure.

 

As an architect you have to know about practical things, for a stadium about security and such things, not only the environment. 

You have to know all these things, not completely, but the logic of all these aspects.

 

Compared to architects of the past like Michelangelo, Alberti, Brunelleschi, Boromini, whose buildings are still here today, do you conceive your work as built to last over centuries? 

The idea of time has changed. The world is moving much faster, and they might change these things in mid-century. I can’t predict if it will be necessary here in twenty years or needed there in a hundred years’ time.

test-4.jpg

The exterior of the Beijing New Airport Terminal building, designed to be user-focused and

sustainable for future growth (Photo: Zaha Hadid Architects

 

Was the MAXXI contemporary art museum in Rome a very difficult project to achieve considering the layers of architecture in Rome – an eternal city, where there is so much architecture of so many centuries?  

I think Rome is paralyzed by its history, so it needs interventions. I like the MAXXI project in Rome and I remember every line. It was a project on the cusp between my semi-tectonic early work and semi-fluid later.

 

Are there some projects you like and some you regret?  

I have not done too much, so I have not regretted them. We have been lucky in very varied experiences, from building a bridge in Abu Dhabi to the stadium here for the pool, or a school in Brixton or a cancer facility in Scotland. Mostly they are big projects.

 

You also design furniture. Do you like that? 

I think it’s fun to do; it’s like making a model. You design something and within a few months you make it, unlike architecture which takes a very long time. A chair is the most significant thing, but we still have not done a chair.

 

Why is your office in London? 

I am a very stubborn person. First, I like London. It’s a great city that has become a greater city in the last twenty or thirty years. I always thought London has great potential in terms of architecture. It’s proven to me, great potential, but not for myself!

 

London is your base. How much time do you spend here? 

A lot, I am trying not to travel so much. I am very lucky to have lots of people in the office who can travel for me. I like to travel, but it’s very exhausting.

 

You said Rome was difficult, but were China, Japan or Azerbaijan easier? 

Not easier, but it depends on the client. Although it’s said that China is difficult, I find China relatively comfortable to work in.

 

What is the process when you start working on a project? 

The process has changed. We used to start working with a sketch, a model, a painting or a model cross-section. With digital and visual technology the skill base has changed. We still look at work in a three dimensional way. It is not a linear process; it is a very back and forth process.

 

Are there many things you can do today with the new technologies? 

There’s more precision and it’s seamless on many layers, not only on the design, but seamless on the process, from the design to engineering to manufacturing to construction. I think that’s very exciting.

test-2.jpg

A rendering of the Abu Dhabi Performing Arts Center (Photo: Zaha Hadid Architects)

Do you have to win a competition to win a job? 

Although competitions are very expensive and sometimes a waste of time, some of the best ideas came out of working against time, without client intervention, in a different kind of space mentally.

 

Is the cost of building a project one of the most significant issues?

I know what is going to become expensive and what is cheap. I think it’s very important that a project is affordable.

test-6.jpg

The Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs building at the American University of Beirut – Zaha Hadid’s alma mater

 

Is common sense an essential quality for your job? 

It is, so you know where the limits are. But having said that I think it’s also very important that cities have great work. Cities should invest in good spatial organization that has more impact rather than just making a terrible cheap building, which you see a lot of.

 

In Hong Kong you won a competition but you didn’t build it. How did you feel? 

When Margaret Thatcher went to Hong Kong, that was the end of that project. It was early in my career and the number of lessons I learned is far greater than if I had built it.

 

The project is still there. Would it change enormously if you did it now? 

I still believe in the carved mountain idea in terms of landscape and topography that came into play in many other projects later. The idea of layering was the most important idea – you can build almost simultaneously as if the layering is compressed in one single moment of time instead of a thousand years.

Is there a “fil rouge” or a guiding light in your work?

The common thread was abstraction, now it is complexity. Thirty years ago it had to do with the modernist ideology, with mass production. To challenge that idea was much more complex, and also the idea of typology changed a lot. Typology was there as one type of library, or office building, or apartment, and I thought you could challenge these. Since the 20th Century the public domain became very important. So you put a building on a particular site, as part of a city, and you engage the site in the life of the city exactly as you do the squares in Rome, for instance. In London the squares are private. It is very important to create these public spaces.

 

What do you think has influenced your taste in design? 

I was influenced by the modernists, but also by constructivism, and the Russian experiment was never fully tested. I became interested in how the site influences the project. What emerged was to look at what I call a field, and the field becomes another topic.

 

When you’re asked to design a hospital, a stadium, or a church, do you first have an idea that very often becomes the project, through intuition?

No, all these things come together. You are constantly thinking about what to do for the next space or tower. When you get site specific you might test some of these ideas on that particular site.

 

The swimming pool stadium in London was from a competition. How did it proceed in your mind? 

Of course water, the pool, the idea of the wave was an obvious idea, and we were interested in the typology of the landscape and computation of the idea of the wave.

 

You said it was tough to be a woman and an Arab. Is it also tough being a Muslim? 

I come from Iraq, and there were many Christians there and lots of Jews and Muslims. I am a Muslim who went to a nuns’ school and for six years of my life I crossed my heart. There was no difference between the Christians and the Muslims.

 

Wars are the enemies of beautiful architecture. How do you feel about that and particularly about Aleppo? 

I used to live in Beirut and that was completely destroyed. As for Aleppo, it’s very disturbing. It’s not about just the architecture; it is about the people who are there. You feel sad about that whether you are from the region or not. If I see people from Africa going through the same problems, I would feel so bad for them even though I am not from Africa. At this day and age, there should be no fighting. It is very sad.

 

Do you think this is a good time in history for architecture?

It’s been a great moment for the past ten or fifteen years. I am always very wary, because I think the pragmatists, the conservatives, are always lurking around the scenes, happy to leap out any minute and scuttle anything interesting.

 

I was thinking about Rome in another way, what about Fascist architecture?

It is now in London, it has migrated from Italy to the UK! (laughs) I don’t think you can separate architecture from the situation. Some of these buildings are of course very monumental and very interesting, but if you look at that period in Germany it’s very austere and extremely oppressive.

 

Are you very comfortable in England?

No, I am not comfortable in England. I like London. I would just say, “I have no work in London!” It’s not out of choice.

 

How about in the USA, a country that loves architecture? 

We are doing a tower in Miami and a building in New York. My two earlier projects consisted of one in Cincinnati and a museum in Michigan.

 

What’s the difference between England and the US?

In the US they mostly do metal steel frame and repetitive floors. Like London, most of the work is corporate, either residential or offices, not like Europe where they have invested in cultural buildings. When it is booming in America they like architecture, when it is not booming they don’t. That’s why I say as an architect you are in the hands of fate.

 

What are your frustrations?

I don’t have any frustrations. If you want an easy life don’t be an architect. Ask anybody in my office. You have to work all the time. If you want a 9 to 5 job and to go home and relax, just don’t do it.

 

Is it not the same for any artist?

The artist is the same. Architects have to organize a plan: you enter here, walk through there, you understand the stairs, you add a room… is it the right size, the wrong size? It is exactly like writing. This is the composition and also you have to edit it, over and over again, so that it looks seamless and effortless.

 

What are the things you like the least and make you impatient?

People not understanding what I am saying to them! That is the most flustering thing. But if you have trained them, they understand you better. I’ll be honest; it’s very difficult to explain things to men. It’s virtually impossible. The older generation in my office think they know everything better than anyone. The younger generation are much more flexible and adaptable. Sloppiness irritates me the most.

 

But the world today…?

I am not hysterical about it (laughs), but I would like them to be less sloppy!

 

You seem to have a very special feeling for Rome?

My parents took me to Rome when I was seven years old and it stayed with me. That flamboyancy of Italy was similar to Beirut. I love those cities, Baghdad or Cairo, which are very tense and dense and with rivers. I am not a romantic but there is something about waterways in that part of the world that has a certain resonance.

 

Are you inspired by Istanbul?

Istanbul is one of my favorite cities; I love it! It’s a kind of composite. I like that Sinan wanted to do these cupolas as if it was a mountain. The Roman Istanbul alone is stunning.

 

And you like the Greek monuments too?

I do. I like many things. This is what you learn from. When you do something you don’t have to repeat it, but you can learn from it.

 

Do you dream of building something in particular?

A project on the level of urbanism and architecture. There are some enormous sites being developed and I would love to do something in London, but I am not keeping my fingers crossed.

Bulgari
Vendome Staycation
Philipp Plein
Porsche